User talk:117.20.68.96

March 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Sennecaster. I noticed that you recently removed content from Aitkenvale, Queensland without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you want to provide a source to correct the information, feel free! unfortunately Wikipedia does not allow original research, so a reputable secondary source needs to be provided. Thanks! retsacennS (Talk) (Pain and Suffering) 01:45, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm RoseGold1250. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Townsville have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. It's rose gold! (T?) 14:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

117.20.68.96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am so frustrated, why is Administrator Graham87 abusing me? a fellow person with a disability. It keep getting blocked for even the most simple of edits which are made in good faith and wikipedia policy says "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism, my original account was blocked because I was trying to edit out information that is not current and is misleading people and making Wikipedia look like a very bad source, even changing the picture for Townsville to another picture also of Townsville prompted a warning and was reverted? How does anyone go about editing Wikipedia if it is locked into a certain way that individual users find acceptable even if it is outdated and not factual? Wikipedia sadly has gone downhill thanks to a few people on power trips. 117.20.68.96 (talk) 04:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be admitting here that you're evading a block. Any IP address or account that you use while evading a block will be blocked in turn. The only way for you to return to editing Wikipedia is to make an unblock request on your original account. If the original block was improper, it can be addressed that way. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.