User talk:122.163.162.131

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Jasmin Bhasin! If you are interested in editing more often, I suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges. Happy editing! Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fylindfotberserk Thanks for the suggestion and image was updated by this ip 39.46.234.202 which is of AlexandraRock88900 and he keeps uploading copyrighted images. Most probably this account is sock [1]. 122.163.162.131 (talk) 16:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for the alert. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 12:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ManaliJain, The edits were made by sock so i reverted it. You don't have problem if you are getting benefits from it. How selfish. 122.163.162.131 (talk) 12:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ManaliJain And you wrote in edit sumamary that i need to read this WP:RSPSOURCES, should i laugh on this. who told you all these guidelines, who used to tell everthing that you did not know, even who is helping you to remove watermark from images. But you don't care as you only think about you and your benefits.122.163.162.131 (talk) 15:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're literally just removing Rolling Stone which is apparently reliable and replacing it with Times Of India whose reliability is considered between no consensus and generally unreliable and stating it as a better source?! Kindly read WP:RSPSS. ManaliJain (talk) 03:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ManaliJain, That is for political related things. It is still reliable for entertainment related things WP: ICTFSOURCES. You used source of rolling stone India which is subsidiary and a primary source. Please have brain and don't be dumb.122.163.162.131 (talk) 04:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ManaliJain, You said TOI in unrelible as per WP:TOI should we remove this source from every article or you would read this [2] and WP:ICTFSOURCES and try undertand that problem with TOI is generaly with controversial and political related topics. It is still a reliable source for entertainment related things that is why it is still there WP:ICTSFOURCES. Please use WP:COMMON SENSE if you have which i doubt. Rolling stone india which is a subsidary of Rolling Stone should be reliable just because its parent company is reliable. Reliablity is not acquired and you used a interview which makes it a Primary Soucre. I would suggest you to read all the guildeline and don't warn people for reason just because you have dispute with any editor. 122.163.162.131 (talk) 06:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.