User talk:123creativeuser

Welcome!

Hi 123creativeuser! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeewi Lee

Thanks for starting the draft article at your user page. I've moved it to Draft:Jeewi Lee, since draft space is the preferred location for draft articles. You might find it helpful to read Help:Your first article. Thanks! Wikishovel (talk) 15:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeewi Lee (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.jeewi.de/about. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Jeewi Lee may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 09:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 123creativeuser! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 09:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeewi Lee (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We read:

Jeewi Lee grew up in an artist family and spent her childhood in various locations in Germany and Korea. Frequent moves from the age of five had a profound effect on her, a theme that is evident in her art. Lee studied painting at the Berlin University of the Arts in the class of Prof. Robert Lucander and at Hunter College, City University of New York, graduating in 2014 as a Master of Fine Arts from the Berlin University of the Arts. In 2018 she received her MFA in the postgraduate programme Art in Context with Prof. Dr. Jörg Heiser at University of the Arts Berlin.

What's the reference for this? (It's not in Zeichnung, Grafik und Fotografie. Kunsthalle Recklinghausen, 5. Dezember 2021 – 30. Januar 2022".)

Also: "Solo exhibitions": Unreferenced (and in reverse order) "Selected group exhibitions": Unreferenced (and in reverse order) "Grants": Unreferenced (and in reverse order) "Art fairs": Unreferenced (and in reverse order)

"Selected literature": Unclear which part of this is related to her work, or how it's related

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeewi Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 22:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hoary,

thanks a lot for your feedback! I now added the correct references that were missing. The selected literature is a monograph with an overview of the artists artworks.

In the art world it's normal to put the exhibition history in reverse order, starting with the newest ones on top.

I hope the article is ready to be published now.

Kind regards 123creativeuser (talk) 09:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeewi Lee (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not clear how they pass WP:NARTIST?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeewi Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello 123creativeuser. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:123creativeuser. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=123creativeuser|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 13:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:123creativeuser, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=123creativeuser|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 15:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 331dot, thank you for your message. I don't know what gives you the impression of a financial stake in promoting the topic? I know the artist who'm the article is about in person and I used to work for the gallery representing her until the end of 2023. Writing this wikipedia article about her is a personal project of mine. Do I need to claim that I know the artist in person anywhere? Looking forward to your response. Kind regards 123creativeuser (talk) 07:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you know the artist, then you should declare a (unpaid) conflict of interest and be familiar with that policy. Making the conflict of interest disclosure is best done on your user page. 331dot (talk) 08:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your feedback. I will write the disclosure on my user page. 123creativeuser (talk) 08:03, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]