User talk:128.112.139.195

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The IP address range 128.112.139.0/24 has been auto-blocked, preventing computers in this range from editing Wikipedia. While there are open proxies in this range--the PlanetLab and CoDeeN research projects--it also includes 128.112.139.195, the outward-facing NAT address for the entire computer science department at Princeton University. Would it be possible to unblock the address 128.112.139.195 specifically? More than 200 students and faculty would appreciate it.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Apéry's constant, even if your ultimate intention is to revert them. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Apéry's constant, you will be blocked from editing. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 05:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
128.112.139.195 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
128.112.139.195 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

{{blocked proxy}}: lots of open proxies in this range


Decline reason: See {{blocked proxy}}. — Sandstein 21:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The blocking admin has indicated that he has unblocked this range. Could you try again? Sandstein 12:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Edward Felten has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 23:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Cold boot attack constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 23:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being vigilant II MusLiM HyBRiD II, but I intended these edits as legitimate corrections and cleanups, and as such they are not vandalism ("Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia."). Let me know if you think they violate Wikipedia's editorial standards. In the future, please take a closer look at the context of other peoples' changes before you undo them. 128.112.139.195 23:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

]

April 2011[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maximum flow problem, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Minima© (talk) 10:39, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandy Steiglitz (December 17)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! 128.112.139.195, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandy Steiglitz (January 21)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit when you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: David L. Nathan has been accepted[edit]

David L. Nathan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]