User talk:12LA

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 12LA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:43, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion sorting of AFDs[edit]

Hello, and thanks for your help with sorting AFDs. But please note that something's gone wrong with the script you appear to have been using (judging from your edit summaries): it's been adding the "People" sort notice multiple times, but not actually listing them at the respective deletion sorting page.
Amethyst Deceivers, for example, is an article about a song. At its AFD, you added "Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions" three times, though it's not about people, and haven't added the AFD to WP:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People. This problem seems to have occurred on all AFDs you've been editing. Could you please investigate this problem, and fix it? Incorrect and unintentionally misleading notices like that hamper a proper discussion at AFD. Thanks, The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:56, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Mighty Glen - I am sorry, this was fully unintentionally, I think something in the script is wrong. I will do everything on AfDs manually from now on till fixed. || Regards // 12LA 13:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018 - AN/I[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 13:48, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 14:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

12LA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am fully here to build and help, please I ask to be unblocked, I have lots of ways to contribute. Thank you

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Merely saying "no" without addressing the issues isn't going to cut it. Huon (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

12LA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, to respond to what Huon said; I understand my AfDs sorting was a bit off, but it was very fully unintentionally and I 2. say that I will not do so kind again and do it manually, (as it was the script who did the wrong-doing), 3 I am now doing it manually and will only delsort it that way till it's fixed. May I know be unblocked please?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ~ GB fan 14:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

12LA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is what I think you mean by disruptive edits: Hello, and thanks for your help with sorting AFDs. But please note that something's gone wrong with the script you appear to have been using (judging from your edit summaries): it's been adding the "People" sort notice multiple times, but not actually listing them at the respective deletion sorting page. Amethyst Deceivers, for example, is an article about a song. At its AFD, you added "Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions" three times, though it's not about people, and haven't added the AFD to WP:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People. This problem seems to have occurred on all AFDs you've been editing. Could you please investigate this problem, and fix it? Incorrect and unintentionally misleading notices like that hamper a proper discussion at AFD. Thanks, The Mighty Glen (talk) The Mighty Glen - I am sorry, this was fully unintentionally, I think something in the script is wrong. I will do everything on AfDs manually from now on till fixed. 12LA I kindly answered that I will try to fix the script, and I have also stopped doing AfDs sorting auto and will do them manually. I am also planning on creating a couple articles regarding Basketball player located in Cali, I am fully here to contribute and nothing else.

Decline reason:

Hello Josh.172. Talk revoked. —DoRD (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's not the reason for your block, this is - WP:ANI#New user account raising eyebrows. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 14:46, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) You are clearly not a new editor. Please dispose your former identity/identities. Giant Snowman 14:46, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]