User talk:132.208.12.85

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Zebroid has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Zebroid was changed by 132.208.12.85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874922 on 2016-11-12T05:57:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 00:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

(BLP violation removed) So, you, out of the blue, and unaware who or what this guy is, deem my edit as vandalism that this fraud is only claiming to be a victims advocate shows how lame wikipedia has come to be.

Per our Biographies of Living Persons policy, all statements about living persons on any page must cite a professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic source to support that claim. That's to avoid libel, which is beyond lame. Drop the pissy attitude, grow up, and recognize that if someone wasn't here to help, they wouldn't be here. Abelmoschus Esculentus's edits fall under WP:NOTVAND, not vandalism. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Hey, troll, scroll to the included quotes and watch for yourself. As such, saying that "he claims to be" something instead of "he is something" is not vandalism and is 100% factual.

If you want to continue being immature and attacking people during your temper tantrums, we can just block you. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

so you're the one having starting the name calling game, calling me "pissy", "immature", "having tantrums", and so on, yet you're threatening me to block me? Again, this reminds me why I quit this troll fueled universe.

I'm describing your behavior. You're calling people names without provocation. Bit of a difference. You're also not doing that great of a job of quitting. Maybe if you considered that you're going about things the wrong way, you could start finding the correct (and easier) way to do things. If all the traffic is coming your way, you're probably in the wrong lane. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

and you're a pro at written fallacies and not-so-subtile personnal attacks. as you wrote "I'm describing your behaviour.

whatever, argue alone with yourself, you've most likely already message the ANI trollboard for backup anyway. Have fun, I'm closing the window.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at J. T. Miller. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Puddleglum2.0 ^{Have a talk?} 18:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2024

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at FIFA Arab Cup, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 22:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

---