User talk:134.159.168.106

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Masha'Allah because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Bhishma has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bhishma was changed by 134.159.168.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944377 on 2014-01-24T15:48:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 134.159.168.106, I'm Masssly. I want to thank you for your contribution. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kaththi, but unfortunately you didn't provide a reliable source. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability and so I had to remove it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Feel free to contact me further if you have any questions. Kind Regards...—Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 14:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to N. Srinivasan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 07:06, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to N. Srinivasan with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 08:25, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Winner 42. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vidya Balan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 23:49, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Kiran Bedi , but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Relentless Flood (August 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Relentless Flood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 134.159.168.106, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NgYShung. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dus Numbri have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NgYShung ^huh? 10:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your humor on Dus Numbri[edit]

Dear 134.159.168.106: Your edits have shown traces of a sense of humor, which is disruptive of the serious, somber, and relentlessly grim mood that so many other good people in all walks of life have exhibited just before burning out entirely. Be advised that if you continue on this present course, you run the risk of enjoying yourself while at work on this project, and you may even have a similar effect on other editors. Please consider very carefully whether you want to be responsible for such consequences. Thank you. -- NgYShung ^huh? 10:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm John of Reading. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Who writes Wikipedia? without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. John of Reading (talk) 10:44, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.