Jump to content

User talk:165.234.104.5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

August 2007

[edit]
  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Rules, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Saturn 5 16:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

[edit]
  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Piaget, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Piaget was changed by 165.234.104.5 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-13T14:16:14+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 18:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hobo. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hobo was changed by 165.234.104.5 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-13T14:18:11+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 18:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Constitution. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Constitution, you will be blocked from editing. HalfShadow 16:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. This is your last warning.
    The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Constitution, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Kansoku 17:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Jesse James:

[edit]

Your recent edit to Jesse James (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 18:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

October 2007

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mapp v. Ohio. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 16:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mapp v. Ohio, you will be blocked from editing. --Rrburke(talk) 16:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mapp v. Ohio, you will be blocked from editing. --Rrburke(talk) 16:28, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Locomotive. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 18:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Steam locomotive, you will be blocked from editing. --Old Moonraker 18:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Plasma (physics), you will be blocked from editing. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 20:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Plasma (physics), you will be blocked from editing. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 20:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2007

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bulbasaur, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bulbasaur was changed by 165.234.104.5 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-12-03T21:03:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 21:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

[edit]

Your recent edit to Hampshire sheep (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Neverquick (talk) 15:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Josquin des Prez (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Josquin des Prez (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kubigula (talk) 15:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


February 2008

[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Realism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 18:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Prehistory. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Badgernet (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, you will be blocked from editing. Puchiko (Talk-email) 17:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 15:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Walter Dean Myers, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Terra 19:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jodi Picoult. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jodi Picoult was changed by 165.234.104.5 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-26T19:55:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Williston High School (North Dakota), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JSpung (talk) 15:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2008

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Juan Trippe. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Juan Trippe was changed by 165.234.104.5 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-02T13:58:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Juan Trippe, you will be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 18:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Encephalitis lethargica, you will be blocked from editing. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 16:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for another 3 months. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Kukini háblame aquí 16:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 13:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Otto Lilienthal, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Otto Lilienthal was changed by 165.234.104.5 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-17T15:42:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Otto Lilienthal constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Otto Lilienthal. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Underoath. —ossmanntalk 16:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Beryllium has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —Pill (talk) 14:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image talk:Unknown Early American Football Team.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image talk:Unknown Early American Football Team.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. rootology (C)(T) 22:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{[subst:bv}} Dlohcierekim 22:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ferdinand Magellan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH PANDAtalk 15:41, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Ferdinand Magellan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 15:47, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Brock Lesnar. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. ♥NiciVampireHeart20:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Lager has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Dspradau 13:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Freddy Krueger constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --Dspradau 15:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, you will be blocked from editing. Grika 17:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for six months


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism, for a period of six months.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Wood Duck has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Grim23 18:52, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Nile Delta has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 15:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rainbow. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rainbow was changed by 165.234.104.5 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-09-25T16:11:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. — Kralizec! (talk) 17:19, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of Honduras-related topics has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps TC 13:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. gadfium 19:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Battle of Trenton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 19:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 22:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Biosphere. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 16:39, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 19:57, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Longbow because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - gadfium 19:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Without explanation of why you are making them, your edits are likely to be reverted. Dougweller (talk) 10:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maya calendar may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[[Mesoamerican long count calendar]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to Maya peoples appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 03:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sololá, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 03:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reference Errors on 10 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  gadfium 04:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Yes and no— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 15:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yes and no. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 15:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jelly bean— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jelly bean. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – Gilliam (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.