User talk:1664s4lunch

April 2011[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 11:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1664s4lunch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block appears to be consequnce of User:Codeine's assertions that recent edits to Stephen Spurr were 'unsourced' and 'libellous'. That is plainly untrue, all changes were meticulously footnoted and verifiable. Indeed, User:Codeine's removal of sourced factual statements is highly irregular 1664s4lunch (talk)5:20 pm, Today (UTC+5.5)

Decline reason:

I have reviewed your edits. You should never add such material in BLPs without discussing on the talk pages of those BLPs first. The non-NPOV statements in some of your edits are clearly without reference and are libelous. Please review our policies and guidelines properly; namely, BLP, BIO, NPOV, V and RS. Also, give special attention to the part in RS about books and how to treat them. Your indefinite block stays. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 12:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There was clear intention to defame: we expect multiple, verifiable references in such cases; what was supplied was entirely inadequate, and you tried to coatrack a separate issue into the article. Read WP:BLP; edits of that kind are unacceptable and will be immediately removed. Acroterion (talk) 12:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Accounts created for purposes of slander/misinformation. Thank you. —DoRD (talk) 11:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]