User talk:178.162.14.162

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to DF Music Organization, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: DF Music Organization was changed by 178.162.14.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952617 on 2012-03-04T00:28:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

September 2018

Note that your edits, such as [1], [2], and [3] are not constructive. What you are reverting is not vandalism. On the other hand, removal of maintenance templates without addressing the quality of the article is a clear damage. If you do not like the edits, you should go and discuss them at the talk page rather than referring to the edits as vandalism and starting edit-warring. If you continue, your account can be blocked from editing. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear colleague! I am just the person who made a major edit in the paper 2017–2018 Russian protests, which you qualified as vandalism (before undertaking correction, I wrote a message on the discussion page of that article, waited for some time, but nobody had objections). I can assure you that my correction had nothing common with vandalism. From the today’s point of view, the version you restored is incomplete and obsolete. It is focused just on the anti-corruption protests organized by Navalny. Especially the preamble is misleading. In fact, in 2017-2018, there were two (!!) major reasons for protests: 1) corruption; 2) retirement age. All other reasons are relatively minor. And, after your “rollback”, many important things related to the retirement-age-related protests including the photos were simply removed. Therefore I believe your action was wrong. If you are not agreed with my words please comment either here or on the discussion page of that article. --Mikisavex (talk) 13:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC) By occasion I have revealed that in the meantime somebody created the article 2018 Russian pension protests. That article was of very low quality but I edited and hopefully improved it. For this reason my above comment is not more actual. So, in “your” article 2017–2018 Russian protests I added some information about the retirement-age protests [in your version, there was just one sentence] with a link to the specialized article. Nothing was removed. --Mikisavex (talk) 07:21, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Recent edit to The Berrics

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Berrics, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 14:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

---