User talk:180.150.113.77

Block evasion (block of User:180.150.112.134)[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also noting this user's pledge to evade this block has been fulfilled. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:17, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried and succeeded. Thanks to some editors and admins out there. Good luck.180.150.113.77 (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure your admin buddies will swoop in any second and remove this two week block. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:25, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why would they remove this block when they can help me edit from different locations? It's easier that way. Don't you think? Have a good weekend by the way :) 180.150.113.77 (talk) 18:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Jamie Jamie, you can keep extending the block but it makes no difference. You and I both know that.180.150.113.77 (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion, WP:CIR[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not block evasion, when the blocks have expired.180.150.113.77 (talk) 04:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

180.150.113.77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm requesting a review. An editor has blocked me even though the block period has expired. He is wrongly stated "block evasion". But the block period expired many days ago. 180.150.113.77 (talk) 04:15, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. Clearly it doesn't matter what is done here, and since you are unable to abide by Wikipedia guidelines, there is nothing more to do here, and I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your edit histories from this IP as well as this range demonstrate a pattern of WP:SYNTH, WP:POV, poor writing, and a general lack of written English skills that are necessary to edit here. Besides, according to your statements above, you know admins who will help you evade any blocks. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, I get what you mean. You got one thing wrong though, my general English skills are good. Of course, when it comes to an advanced level, I admit, I'm not good. If I had a "general lack of written English skills", I wouldn't be able to string a sentence together; or all my sentences would have serious spelling mistakes. Cheers.180.150.113.77 (talk) 14:26, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a matter of spelling mistakes; it's the haphazard nature of your additions along with the POV commentery frequently included. I reblocked you because the first thing you did are your previous block was reinstate these two edits [1],[2]; per WP:NOTNEWS, it's not appropriate to tack on a standalone sentence every time a subject is mentioned passing in a news story. Then there's the WP:SYNTH; "corrupt naval gunman", and unencyclopedic phrasing such as "some army boys" and "shot him dead". And then there's this sort of thing; "lying cow," along with the abusive edit summary. There are plenty of other similar examples here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rosarito Beach has been reverted.
Your edit here to Rosarito Beach was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2326178924103/deep-blue-sea-ending-explained) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Thanks. Yes, I was thinking the same. But why is this page not allowed?180.150.113.77 (talk) 15:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Google Glass. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again (disruption, edit-warring, adding fabricated material not supported by source, and general WP:CIR)[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TPA removed for personal attacks. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.