Jump to content

User talk:185.65.135.171

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crisis in Venezuela. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Jamez42 (talk) 23:49, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Crisis in Venezuela. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to losing your editing privileges. Thank you. --Jamez42 (talk) 23:49, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! I've been in touch with the editor who made the changes to unvalidated sources. Is it some specific editor on the talk page I should talk with? Thanks.

185.65.135.171 (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


User ZiaLater pointed out that the information was sourced. As such, in an ideal scenario, you should provide evidence on how these sources aren't reliable or how the content is not verifiable. The best option is to make a proposal and to look for an agreement with this user. --Jamez42 (talk) 10:29, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]