User talk:190.219.244.97

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

190.219.244.97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't broke Wikipedia's policies, the Administrator that blocked me didn't provided a valid reason for doing so, I want an explanation.

Decline reason:

I have investigated your edits, including the talk page comment left by this IP address about 24 hours ago. It was so offensive, I extended the block to 72 hours. Wikipedia has no place for people who would leave comments like that. If you did that, find some other place to troll because we don't want that here. Yamla (talk) 20:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

190.219.244.97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I feel very insulted by your previous comment, mister administrator, I know I sexually harassed Keilana because I find her beautiful... And I don't repent because I won't change my mind because you're able to block me on Wikipedia... I shall become a martyr for all those men persecuted by feminism. Likewise I don't understand your rage, but I do understand that you're such a evil person that it's unimaginable what you're capable of doing. I feel bad for you, yes my post was offensive, but Keilana was supposed to respond to it. Feel free to permanently block me because it appears you (admin) doesn't want me in the community, yet blocked me for 72 hours? It's sad that we cannot discuss this in peace because you're engaged in a rage war with me. Anyways not gonna appeal this block again, Do What You Want my friend.190.219.244.97 (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Request withdrawn. 331dot (talk) 21:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block extended, talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

---