User talk:191.205.41.210

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:BCEC:EA7B:AA5F:E37D (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But I added references.

Nickelodeon and Comedy Central is no longer allowed on Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney. 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:BCEC:EA7B:AA5F:E37D (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No one agreed with you. Are you defending your act of vandalism? 191.205.41.210 (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:BCEC:EA7B:AA5F:E37D (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:BCEC:EA7B:AA5F:E37D (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney

Thank you for providing refs for your edits to this page. I just wanted to note that the ref you provided for Nickelodeon does not state anywhere on the page that I could see that Fox or Sky are operating Nickelodeon UK/Ireland as a joint venture with Viacom. From the verbage of the page, it sounds implicit that Viacom is operating Nickelodeon as a wholly owned operation. Can you please provide a source that shows that Sky/Fox is involved in the operation of Nickelodeon UK/Ireland? 青い(Aoi) (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I warned the user. 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:BCEC:EA7B:AA5F:E37D (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

191.205.41.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think you are helping the vandals to delete the sourced content. 191.205.41.210 (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 21:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think characterizing a content dispute as vandalism and good-faith editors as vandals is a good way to get your block extended. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

191.205.41.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't edit that article nevermore. If I edit, you can reblock me. 187.26.78.85 (talk) 21:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You did edit the article with the new IP address, and you were blocked under that address, too. Huon (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't have time at the moment, but reviewing admins should examine some of the other edits from this range. —DoRD (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.