Jump to content

User talk:194.218.16.122

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Tiderolls 15:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (194.218.16.122) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Peaceray (talk) 23:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to History of modern Greece has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to List of African supercentenarians, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 11:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sock editing

[edit]

@EdJohnston: This appears to be a second IP [[1]] Springee (talk) 18:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for evasion

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for Block evasion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

See this complaint on my talk page for the original problem. You are evidently the same person as 81.230.149.213 (talk · contribs) and User:BjörnBergman. EdJohnston (talk) 18:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of British supercentenarians‎ does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

194.218.16.122 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

This IP address is blocked because we believe it's being used to WP:EVADE another block. You have not addressed this in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 15:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why do you block me? Have I vandalized Wikipedia??? Please unblock me. 194.218.16.122 (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean when you say I'm "believed to have evaded another block"? I'm NOT evading another block. 194.218.16.122 (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no proof that I'm "evading another block", then it is not reasonable to block me, please unblock. 194.218.16.122 (talk) 15:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

194.218.16.122 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

If you're trying to convince me that you're a completely different person who just happens to be using this same IP that has previously been used for block evasion to edit the same articles as an indef blocked user, you're failing miserably. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 15:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.