User talk:1989 Santa
November 2014
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dilma Rousseff has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dilma Rousseff was changed by 1989 Santa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874142 on 2014-11-29T13:00:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:00, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at NORAD Tracks Santa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: NORAD Tracks Santa was changed by 1989 Santa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874765 on 2014-11-29T13:01:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Polar Express, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Polar Express was changed by 1989 Santa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868231 on 2014-11-29T13:03:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:03, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Vsmith (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
1989 Santa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I think there are good reasons why I should be unblocked. Fistly, I am here to build an encyclopedia and secondly, Vsmith is an incompetent administrator and a retarded idiot who should be blocked instead. (see Wikipedia:Competence is required, Vsmith. I found this while looking at your guide to appealing blocks). Thirdly, I did nothing wrong, all I did was say the truth. Another thing: Can I create another account and quit adding what you call bad edits and instead do something you call "constructive"? Like I quit editing about NORAD tracks Santa?1989 Santa (talk) 14:14, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Attacking admins in your unblock requests is a great way to not get unblocked. only (talk) 14:28, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.