Jump to content

User talk:199.107.56.222

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Philip Perry[edit]

Hello, I restored the section that you deleted earlier on the subjects private sector work. You did not offer a reason for your deletion, so it registers as vandalism. If you have a valid beef with that section, or if you believe there are source errors or language problems, please take it to the talk page. Thanks....Phoebe13 (talk) 16:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]




Eventing[edit]

You wrote (regarding Rolex) "The purported lack of interest stemmed primarily from certain officials and national team coaches with either substantial connections to breeders of heavier horses, or to owners and riders who may have profited from more opportunities to compete their horses during a season, possibly to the horses' long term detriment. Support for the classic format is almost universal among lower-level riders and owners."

Now, I'm all for the long format, but this sounds a bit non-NPOV. Could you source the information regarding the "certain officials" who have these connections? Who are these breeders of heavier horses (b/c as far as I know, the event horse breeding scene in the US is pretty small) that have such power? And just because the classic format is widely supported by the lower-level riders, doesn't mean that this base is providing enough funds for the continuation of the classic format at the *** and **** level. You make it sound like there are a few people who are running the show, and manipulating the Rolex event to force it to remain short format. I always thought the organizer was a huge fan of the classic format. Why would she give in to these people? Now, I don't rub shoulders with upper level riders or run in those kind of circles, so you could be hitting the nail right on the head, but could you please provide a source? Eventer 21:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July, 2007[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page December 11 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Matchups 20:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nelson, British Columbia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CutOffTies (talk) 01:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Yintan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Philip Perry, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Yinta 12:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]