User talk:199.7.158.59

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

March 2024[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Sergei Melgunov. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Waylon (was) (here) 15:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

eben removing unsourced lies ? 199.7.158.59 (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sergei Melgunov, you may be blocked from editing. Never mind, this is clearly vandalism. Waylon (was) (here) 15:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What makes this guy "a historian". Is "a historian" anybody who published an opinion about history? He has NO SOURCES he doesnt explain why ANYTHING IN HIS BOOK should be taken as true, and he offers NO COLLABORATION AT ALL OF ANY KIND.WITH ANY OTHER HISTORIAN 199.7.158.59 (talk) 15:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sergei Melgunov, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Waylon (was) (here) 15:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Sergei Melgunov, you may be blocked from editing. Waylon (was) (here) 15:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what makes that "inappropriate" in your mind? 199.7.158.59 (talk) 15:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't edit pages because of what you believe about the person. Plus, this warning in question was for general discussion of the topic. Waylon (was) (here) 15:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I believe m so you believe there IS a useful unbiased source that lists this guy as a "historian".

Great let's see it. 199.7.158.59 (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Further Reading", there's a paper written by him. He was clearly writing history, showing him as a historian. https://ia804502.us.archive.org/28/items/RedTerrorInRussia1918-1923/S.P.Melgunov_Red_Terror_In_Russia_1918-1923_En.pdf Waylon (was) (here) 15:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

he is a VICTIM in the dispute and you are asking we take him at his word. He didn't do "historical studies" of what anybody else in the dispute said, at all, he just wrote his perspective or lies about when he was there 199.7.158.59 (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Smalljim Can you revoke his talk page access, as he keeps arguing. Waylon (was) (here) 15:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what makes that "scholarly"? The complete lack of citations or sources? The ambiguity in the words? 199.7.158.59 (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i really think you should stop before you could get blocked. im sure people who contribute through your ip wouldnt like that.. >:c Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 15:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

..i warned you Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 15:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

seema like your job is to protect this one page from any and all edits. Is there ANY way this could.be improved to you, or do I need to go over your head? 199.7.158.59 (talk) 15:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Small jim 15:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.