User talk:19ben94

Hey

Hey Ben! Great that you've joined Wikipedia. Hope that you don't get lost.--Jedidiah evans (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry, I should have been more formal. Hello!--Jedidiah evans (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Actually, scrap that. Hey is fine, right?--Jedidiah evans (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Or, maybe not. Gosh, the rules are tricky here. Hey? Hello? Ahoy?!!--Jedidiah evans (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

On whether hey or hello is better

Hi Ben. I'm curious what you think about this important question of etiquette.--Jedidiah evans (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Hello

Hope that answers your question. --Jed! (talk) 22:26, 2 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

I'm really relieved by your response. Thank you Ben.--Jedidiah evans (talk) 22:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Hi

Welcome to wikipedia Ben! --Erikpridgen (talk) 22:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Norman (director) (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The tone is not appropriate 'the film was a breakout project in his career and he attributes it as his most important work." " infamous result" " most famous for" " breakout project in his career" etc etc

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Norman (director) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matt Norman (director), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:46, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 19ben94! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:46, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Matt Norman (director)

Hello, 19ben94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Matt Norman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]