User talk:1pwalker3

I was satisfied it met the guidelines on notability?

1pwalker3, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi 1pwalker3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Percival, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 17:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A comment was left at the point of removal to confirm that enough in-depth, independent sources have been published about the subject to overcome any notability issues. These include national newspapers and sufficiently varies citations. Please therefore remove the template as it now clearly meets the notability guidelines. 1pwalker3 (talk) 17:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cpercival. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 17:11, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]