User talk:1xristos2

Welcome

Hello 1xristos2, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

1xristos2, good luck, and have fun. – The ChampionMan 1234 09:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm TheChampionMan1234. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to SourceLair seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please note that you must not promote the product if that is what you mean to do. If you want the page to remain In Wikipedia, please state notability, and make sure that it is not written like an advertisement, thank you, and happy editing The ChampionMan 1234 09:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC) The ChampionMan 1234 09:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SourceLair

Hi,

First, I have some good news for you. SourceLair was deleted through Wikipedia's proposed deletion process, which means that anyone's protest, including yours, is sufficient to get the article restored. I will restore it shortly. Having said that, the article still is in danger of being deleted. Let me explain: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a chronicle of everything that has ever existed. To show that a subject is fit for coverage in an encyclopedia, the subject must demonstrate encyclopedic notability. This means that the subject must have received significant attention in independent, reliable sources. Basically, the subject must be of interest to either the general public (shown through press attention), scholars (shown through journal articles), or industry specialists (shown through articles in trade publications.) Currently, the sources for SourceLair do not appear to be independent. Facebook pages, the program's own website, and twitter feeds -- these are not reliable sources in an encyclopedic sense. To maintain the article long-term, you must demonstrate that the software is encyclopedically notable. Some ideas on how to do this are listed here. (Note this page is not a formal guideline, but still gives a good sense of what a software article can do to escape deletion problems.) If you have further questions, feel free to ask me anytime. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SourceLair Logo, 4096x4096.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SourceLair Logo, 4096x4096.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 1xristos2. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 22:28, 21 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, 1xristos2. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article SourceLair, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your reply. I read some of the articles but there are too much info to read them all. Initially, I added a disclaimer to my user page (I didn't know about it before). Concerning reliable resources I am not sure what to change, maybe add some more neutral articles from other webpages except for our official blog? Concerning notability and advertisement, I am not sure what we should do. It will help if I propose to some users to right in wikipedia according to their own experience?

My main concept was to create a wikipage with the basic information and let people all over the world to change it in order to be neutral. All, I want is a wikipage without issues. 1xristos2