User talk:2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB

May 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC) I am not "disruptive editing" am trying to have open discussion. Please stop vandalizing my work(disruptive editing). You feminists should be blocked from editing (any maybe even using the Internet in general)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions. Acroterion (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 20:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I thought anyone can edit? How can WP say anyone can edit if people are censored for making improvements to articles that contradict the opinion of those who think they are better than others? If we cannot have open productive disucssion without resorting to censorship, WP should false advertising saying anyone can edit I cannot... The idea of WP works in theory, but it's because of vandals like you I hate Wikipedia. I was just going to correct the part that said MGTOW was "misognictic" but thought we could have mature open productive discussion, how foolish of me. This is why MGTOW have to post on Freenet and places resitant to censorship like we are in China... 2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB (talk) 20:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Anyone can edit" does not mean "anyone can edit about anything at any time in any manner without restriction or limitation". Given your WP:BATTLEGROUND philosophy I see no benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you. I think you were lucky it was only a week. 331dot (talk) 21:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

For the third time, read the FAQ. Talkpages aren't fora for debate, they're for specific, actionable, sourced suggestions with support in reliable publications, not your personal interpretations. And it's a little hard to take you seriously when you call for feminists to be banned from the Internet. Acroterion (talk) 20:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to debate, you feminists started a debate calling MGTOW "misognistic". And yes if you censor my work you should be banned, not me. 2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB (talk) 20:59, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to take you feminists seriously when you say MGTOW iswhite supremency? I am MGTOW and black. That was the funniest thing I heard in a while.. It's hard to take women seriously When I cared about how women think they never told me and got offended and ecause of that guys stop caring, and they are still offended. How do I win? Go MGTOW... 2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB (talk) 21:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my "personal interpreation" MGTOW fact... You are free to disagree and post, but if you have to resort to censorship instead of productive discussion then that shows you are wrong...

MGTOW is the male version of feminism, so they feminism page should point out that feminists are man haters, not say it's about gender equality(feminists personal interpretation). How can a movement about gender equality be named after one gender while excluding the other? That should be fixed.

While blocked, you may only use this page to request to be unblocked. If you want to get into a massive debate about terminology, do it elsewhere. 331dot (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then please unblock me so I can post like normal. If one advocates for women's rights they call it gender equality. But if man advocates for his, he is labelled "misognistic". So much for equality. I wish I was equal to women in this feminist soceity... 2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB (talk) 21:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"do it elsewhere" "This is why MGTOW have to post on Freenet and places resitant to censorship like we are in China"

Where do you suggest? Freenet? 2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not getting into a massive debate, I am talking about improvements to the article and you feminists are calling it debate because it goes against your personal opinion. I am anti-feminist gender rights so I shoud be allowed to dicuss that and the fact that I am black MGTOW and that calling MGTOW "white supremacy" is blasphemy and the fact I am black discussing that is allowed. 2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB (talk) 21:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would't point out that I am black MGTOW is the article didn't mention white supremacy when MGTOW has nothing to do with race. MGTOW is for men of all races. 2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB (talk) 21:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where you have your debate is not my problem. Read the FAQ on the talk page you posted to. Only well sourced(to independent reliable sources), specific changes should be proposed. If you have independent reliable sources that say your ideology/movement is not white supremacist, you should offer them once unblocked. 331dot (talk)

Block evasion as BlackMGTOW (talk · contribs) noted and IP block extended. Acroterion (talk) 21:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have to make an acct to edit coz you censored me for making improvements that go against your personal feminist beliefs. 2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Where you have your debate is not my problem." You have a problem if you debate my improvements too the article and talk about debates. If any references to misogny and especially white supremecy when I am black MGTOW then there would be no "debate". 2001:56A:F643:5500:11BD:6BC3:F207:39AB (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage access revoked. Acroterion (talk) 21:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.