User talk:2012 is a LEGENDARY year

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, 2012 is a LEGENDARY year! Thank you for your contributions. I am Tingo Chu and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tingo Chu (talk) 09:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eckersley[edit]

I see you removed him from the TFC roster. Source that he's not returning to Toronto FC? Noonehasthisnameithink (talk) 19:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Buomesca Tué Na Bangna[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Buomesca Tué Na Bangna, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thechels.info/wiki/Buomesca_Tu%C3%A9_Na_Bangna.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buomesca Tué Na Bangna[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buomesca Tué Na Bangna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 23:10, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dino Fazlić[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dino Fazlić requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 23:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Sampson[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jack Sampson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 23:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buomesca Tué Na Bangna[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buomesca Tué Na Bangna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 23:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buomesca Tué Na Bangna[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buomesca Tué Na Bangna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 23:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's discussion. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Buomesca Tué Na Bangna Vanadus (talk | contribs) 23:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buomesca Tué Na Bangna[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buomesca Tué Na Bangna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 00:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Buomesca Tué Na Bangna. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 00:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buomesca Tué Na Bangna[edit]

The article Buomesca Tué Na Bangna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Buomesca Tué Na Bangna for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Buomesca Tué Na Bangna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buomesca Tué Na Bangna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dino Fazlić[edit]

The article Dino Fazlić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL in my opinion and there may be copyright infringements too... seems to be copy & paste.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Dino Fazlić, you may be blocked from editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dino Fazlić[edit]

The article Dino Fazlić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL in my opinion and there may be copyright infringements too... seems to be copy & paste. My last PROD was removed by author.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 15:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of footballers[edit]

Hello there, not all footballers are notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. Footballers must pass either WP:GNG which means they have received significant cover in the media or WP:NFOOTBALL which means the player has made their first team debut for their club & the club must be in a fully professional league, here is a list of WP:FPL fully professional leagues. If you want can create a players article as a Wikipedia:User pages & then move it to main space when the player has made his fully pro debut this will avoid your articles being deleted.Regards ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alex-Ray Harvey[edit]

This article needs work! The first thing I noticed is that you've done a copy/paste from his profile at BFC and not even bothered to ref it. If you did it with the Burnley section, where else have you done it?? It needs to be sufficiently different to make it your own work, and more neutral. Facts such as place and date of birth should be ref'd, while you can use the BFC profile for this article soccerbase is commonly used (if not always accurate). It also needs some Categories, see Jay Rodriguez (right at the bottom) for some examples. This is not an exhaustive list of the article's problems, just the one's I've noticed up to now. --Trappedinburnley (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS Please put brief descriptions of the changes you make to an article in the Edit summary box before you save, it helps other editors keep track of things --Trappedinburnley (talk) 11:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have listed this player, and Joe Jackson (English footballer), for deletion. --Pretty Green (talk) 15:53, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And Andy Cook (footballer) as well. Pretty Green (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PAY ATENTION[edit]

I strongly advise that you DO NOT KEEP IGNORING the messages on this page! People are trying to show how to use this site. You should be made aware that it would take an Admin about 5 minutes to remove every contribution that your username has ever made. If it becomes apparent that you have made repeated copyright violations that is what is likely to happen. For now, you need to STOP CREATING NEW ARTICLES and figure out how to save the ones you have already created.--Trappedinburnley (talk) 14:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Jackson (English footballer) and Alex-Ray Harvey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop tampering with afd tags on articles nominated for deletion. Doing so, makes it more difficult to have any meaningful discussion on the matter. Further tampering may be construed as vandalism. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have a number of concerns about your editing:

1. Most importantly, you need to start engaging with other editor's or may find your self blocked.

2. When creating new articles, you need to ensure that the topic meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, called notability. The guideline specific to football is pretty straight forward. To be notable, a footballer must have played in a fully pro league or for his/her country's national team.

3. As I've already stated, don't tamper with deletion processes. This means don't alter articles for deletion tags until the discussion is complete, don't remove speedy deletion tags from article's you created, and don't remove proposed deletion tags without providing reason.

To discuss the matter, please post in the space below, on my talk page or on talk page for the WikiProject on football. Best Regards. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Niki-Lee Bulmer[edit]

The article Niki-Lee Bulmer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article that fails WP:GNG (all sources are routine sports journalism) about a footballer who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 07:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Alexander Kačaniklić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free kick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Curtis Obeng[edit]

The article Curtis Obeng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL & WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 21:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Curtis Obeng, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 21:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Curtis Obeng for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Curtis Obeng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtis Obeng until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:31, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Hello. Please understand that text on most websites is copyright to its owners. That means we can't just copy and paste most or all of a webpage into a Wikipedia article, as you did at Curtis Obeng with content from Wrexham FC's website and the BBC. See Wikipedia:Non-free content#Text where it says "Extensive quotation of copyrighted text is prohibited". This is the case even if you supply a reference to the source of the content. Please don't do it again. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]