User talk:202.169.114.130

Thornbury attack

Before reverting the page again, please see Talk:National Socialist Network. - AndreyKva (talk) 03:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Same as above

Any justification for reverting me? I see @AndreyKva has already mentioned this. There's no justification for removing that section, why do you keep removing it? It's fully sourced. GraziePrego (talk) 06:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do not post unfounded and unimportant things. Simple as 202.169.114.130 (talk) 13:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

That doesn't clarify anything. Make a case. AndreyKva (talk) 01:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

National Socialist Network

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on National Socialist Network. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Thinking you are right is not a reason to engage in edit warring. With edits [1], [2] and [3] you have reverted the article three times within a 24 hour period. If you revert one more time within the 24 hour period you will be in violation of WP:3RR. TarnishedPath^talk 11:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TarnishedPath^talk 13:48, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (National Socialist Network) for a period of 1 month for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 13:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

male 202.169.114.130 (talk) 14:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Personal Attacks

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:National Socialist Network, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please don't direct personal attacks at other editors like you did in this edit. Kind Regards TarnishedPath^talk 14:18, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

have some charity 202.169.114.130 (talk) 14:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

How about we see if your attitude has changed in a month's time. TarnishedPath^talk 14:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Managing conflicts of interest

Hello, 202.169.114.130. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page National Socialist Network, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

what are you INSINUATING ? 202.169.114.130 (talk) 14:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

---