User talk:206.213.190.64

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, 206.213.190.64. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by GoingBatty (talk) 17:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Heap leaching, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Beowulf. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 19:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Sardinia. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Drummingman Talk 19:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Science and inventions of Leonardo da Vinci. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SkyWarrior 21:19, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that triggered the edit filter. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:50, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.213.190.64 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am really sorry for deleting Inventions of Leonardo Da Vinci

Decline reason:

Vandalism has been going on for the better part of a year. I see no benefit to lifting this block early and strongly expect we'll have to block for a substantially longer time, next time. Yamla (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.213.190.64 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand my wrong actions, I shouldn't trigger the edit filter. I feel like I have learned from that, and I won't do it again. That is a reason I was blocked, but the other was making edits to talk page. Those were test edits, and I undid those edits. I also understand that being wrong, and I won't do it again. Here is where I did my bad edits: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_inventions_of_Leonardo_da_Vinci and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:206.213.190.64. I promise you I have learned from these and I wont do this again

Decline reason:

You say what you won't do, but not what you will do. 331dot (talk) 06:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

206.213.190.64 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand my wrong actions, I shouldn't trigger the edit filter. I feel like I have learned from that, and I won't do it again. That is a reason I was blocked, but the other was making edits to talk page. Those were test edits, and I undid those edits. I also understand that being wrong, and I won't do it again. Here is where I did my bad edits: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_inventions_of_Leonardo_da_Vinci and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:206.213.190.64. I promise you I have learned from these and I wont do this again. In the future, I will only edit if necessary (Eg: there is some mistake in a wiki page). If I want to test edit, I will use the sandbox. I will not make any pointless edits to the talk page

Accept reason:

I will assume good faith and lift the block. Please be warned, any further instances of pointless edits or triggering the filter will result in a substantially extended block. Please make it count. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]