User talk:20bushnc

May 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Easy Money has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Easy Money was changed by 20bushnc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973672 on 2015-05-24T03:12:34+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Schooler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chhandama (talk) 03:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mike Schooler has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mike Schooler was changed by 20bushnc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944059 on 2015-06-09T16:59:12+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Stall Theory

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Stall Theory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mike Schooler— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to The Stall Theory. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. /wia /tlk 03:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Schooler with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Sdffg"

Sdffg, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Free Bullets (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Possession of stolen goods, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Possession of stolen goods was changed by 20bushnc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.991843 on 2015-12-09T21:48:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at O Canada.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: O Canada was changed by 20bushnc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964476 on 2015-12-09T21:50:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]