User talk:20p

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:World of Warcraft, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bettia ^(talk) 13:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Doofus stunts[edit]

A tag has been placed on Doofus stunts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Official, you will be blocked from editing. Collectonian (talk) 14:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:Ecoleetage has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 17:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia talk:Adopt-a-User constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Thingg^⊕^⊗ 17:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Avruch^T 17:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism-only[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Ian Cairns (talk) 17:44, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]