User talk:220.101.15.161

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 220.101.15.161, is registered to Optus Macquarie Park (OCS) and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Contract killing has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Contract killing was changed by 220.101.15.161 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939933 on 2016-11-27T03:28:02+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Drewmutt. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to E231 series— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Drewmutt (talk) 01:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at E231 series. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: E231 series was changed by 220.101.15.161 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.980966 on 2017-01-07T01:27:58+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 209 series, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 209 series was changed by 220.101.15.161 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954811 on 2017-01-07T07:22:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Banned

I Have Been Blocked By User:Materialscientist, And I Don't Wanna Be Blocked! :(

This Isn't Even Very Good! :(

I Need To Have A Good Reason! :(

I Want To Be Here To Build An Encyclopedia... :(

I Don't Really Wanna Let Anyone To Block Me! >:(

Actually, I was intent on gaining due recognition for my role in the creation of Encyclopædia Dramatica. I haven't vandalized anything.

Hello! Hello, admins! Please unblock me! I did not receive any warning, notification or opportunity to discuss Materialscientist's concern prior to my banning and I am not a vandal. Materialscientist does not allow users to e-mail him and I cannot post on Materialscientist's user talk page or any admin page to discuss this! 220.101.15.161 (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still Banned

I haven't heard anything about why I was banned, how long I will be banned or whether there has been any review progress. 220.101.15.161 (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

220.101.15.161 sings

Copyright lyrics removed. Optimist on the run (talk) 08:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

220.101.15.161 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm So Sorry! 220.101.15.161 (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 01:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

220.101.15.161 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm So Sorry User:PhilKnight! :( I'm Going To Make Some Helpful Contributions! :) 220.101.15.161 (talk) 21:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Feel free to create an account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

220.101.15.161 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello! Hello, admins! Please unblock me! I did not receive any warning, notification or opportunity to discuss Materialscientist's concern prior to my banning and I am not a vandal. Materialscientist does not allow users to e-mail him and I cannot post on Materialscientist's user talk page or any admin page to discuss this! 220.101.15.161 (talk) 06:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Feel free to create an account. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

220.101.15.161 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry For The Vandalism And Trolling! 220.101.15.161 (talk) 01:07, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you persist in repeating variations of the same unblock request without demonstrating that you understand why you were blocked, or what you intend to change, I have removed your ability to edit this page. Optimist on the run (talk) 08:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 11:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.