User talk:24.119.52.86

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


November 2008[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --VS talk 07:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.119.52.86 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

who the heck doesn't like dragons? seriously! ."-,.__ `. `. , .--' .._,'"-' `. . .' `' `. / ,' ` '--. ,-"' `"`

Decline reason:

Nope — Alex Muller 08:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mulch has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. JaGatalk 00:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Muffin (English) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Kickflip, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 20:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

48 hour block[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 20:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.119.52.86 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i am a wikipedia vandal. the fulfillment that you find in reverting edits would not be possible without me. therefore seeing as how i provide you with that which you need for this enjoyment, it would be reasonable that you leave me unblocked and unbanned so that you might continue to have regular reverts to make! in fact, if you come across me and i am blocked, unblock me so that we can do our parts! it's what you do, it's what i do, our purposes coexist! i promise i will never be profane and all of my vandalisms will be at least mildly laughable to co complete irrelevance. have a great day, and God bless :)

Decline reason:

There are much better ways to help Wikipedia, and this is not a reason to unblock you. – Luna Santin (talk) 10:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.