Jump to content

User talk:24.173.80.58

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Please stop

[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did (twice) to Niger. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --- Hillel 20:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


February 2007

[edit]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Culturally significant neologisms from The Simpsons. It is considered vandalism which, under Wikipedia guidelines, can lead to blocks being applied. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 21:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is the only warning you will receive. If you vandalize Wikipedia once again, as you did to Culturally significant neologisms from The Simpsons, you will be blocked. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 00:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Texas, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — TKD::Talk 19:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2007

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to NATO, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: NATO was changed by 24.173.80.58 (c) (t) deleting 15741 characters on 2007-09-10T12:47:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 16:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is your final warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Latin, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Our Lady of Fatima. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Our Lady of Fatima:

[edit]

Your recent edit to Our Lady of Fatima (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 18:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Our Lady of Fatima, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The dozens, you will be blocked from editing. Tiddly-Tom 17:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

January 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea was changed by 24.173.80.58 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-01-24T22:23:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

[edit]

Your recent edit to Atonement Academy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

[edit]

Your recent edit to Karankawa([1]) was reverted by a contentious user. The edit did not provide any type of source and did not appear to add to the overall usefulness of the page. Your IP/handle has been reported to moderators. Please refrain from making nonconstructive(and ultimately useless) edits in the future. If you wanna play, go play in the sandbox. Vu1kan (talk) 08:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to James Cook. Your edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. TREKphiler hit me ♠ 22:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to James Cook has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 17:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to James Cook constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to James Cook. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Paintball. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Benedict Arnold, you will be blocked from editing. Tedickey (talk) 15:04, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Kralizec! (talk) 15:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: block duration: one week

January 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Freedom of Choice Act, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Freedom of Choice Act was changed by 24.173.80.58 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-12T14:12:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for another two weeks. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Kukini háblame aquí 14:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Extinction event. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 16:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Tephra, you will be blocked from editing. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 16:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

September 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 12:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Battles of Lexington and Concord. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Rich Farmbrough, 12:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC). 12:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Stamp Act. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Rich Farmbrough, 12:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC). 12:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy96 12:52, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maximilian Kolbe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

February 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maximilian Kolbe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jefferson Davis, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 15:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Edwin M. Stanton constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Bped1985 (talk) 15:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Spanish missions in Texas, you may be blocked from editing. IrishFBall32 (talk) 21:04, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Porte Saint-Denis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Triumphal Arch of Moscow with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. smtchahal(talk) 16:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Congo with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 16:26, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Hebrew Christian Alliance of Great Britain. Wikipelli Talk 16:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Real de Catorce has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

January 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lorenzo de Zavala— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --allthefoxes (Talk) 20:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iceberg. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Iceberg was changed by 24.173.80.58 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87448 on 2016-01-06T20:21:39+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lorenzo de Zavala, you may be blocked from editing. Jacona (talk) 20:54, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.173.80.58&oldid=1251537542"