User talk:24.233.99.119

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

February 2011[edit]

Please note that at least one of your recent edits also introduced some extraneous text around some numerical characters. This may be due to a combination of your browser and Skype trying to identify and highlight telephone numbers. Please double-check any edits you may perform that include numbers, as this may introduce unnecessary characters into the page. Thank you. Nakon 00:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ásthma. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 15:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to iPad 2, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mono (talk) 00:31, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Speedy deletion nomination of File talk:YablokoLogo.png[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Slim[edit]

Hi, I've had to revert your recent entry to Carlos Slim. The information you added was already in the lead section of the article and, furthermore, it "broke" the sentence, making it clumsy to read. Might I suggest that before you edit again you first read through the entire article to ensure that you are not duplicating information etc? Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 21:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Turmoil has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Chzz ► 13:32, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2011[edit]

Just wanted to let you know that I have reverted this edit since it appears to be in error. Perhaps I am mistaken, but I can find no record of User:Nprstaff creating an article. If this post and my actions were in error, apologies in advance. Shearonink (talk) 18:03, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was also wondering if you wouldn't mind giving your rationale for this redirect, which wiped out a stub/disambig article and re-directs queries to the 'Our Gang' comedies (instead of to the stub/disambig's previous content). Before I post a question like this on an editor's talkpage, I usually first take a look at the accompanying edit summary, but in this instance the edit summary was only the re-direct. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i did not do it24.233.99.119 (talk) 20:29, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Ckatz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Baseball Watcher 20:32, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Ckatz. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Funandtrvl (talk) 20:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Gastroesophageal reflux disease, you may be blocked from editing. (The reverted edit can be found here). Shearonink (talk) 01:16, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you edit someone else's talk page by (mis)placing a 'semi-protected edit request' template there? 'Semi-protected edit requests' are only valid for use on talk-pages, to request an edit on the associated article. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to National Geographic (magazine) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – iridescent 10:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Geographic (magazine) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – iridescent 10:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Geographic (magazine) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. – iridescent 10:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at National Geographic (magazine) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – iridescent 10:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. – iridescent 10:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

test i cant edit sandbox[edit]

May 2011[edit]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Edward III of England. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Shearonink (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sexual conflict, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shearonink (talk) 15:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This Level 4 Warning is being given because of vandalism on other articles including Red Shaver.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

24.233.99.119 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

24.233.99.119 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism

Blocking administrator: KFP (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Regular pattern of vandalism from anonymous account. If you already have an account, you can login - however, you cannot create one from this IP address. Someone in NH appears to be quite intent on vandalizing an encyclopedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:28, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You must give a good reason for us to unblock you. Otherwise, we won't. Peridon (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2011 (UTC)I cant log in my acount[reply]

un block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.233.99.119 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i can,t log in my acount i can,t make a new user

Decline reason:

Indeed. That's because, as has been pointed out above, you are blocked from editing because of vandalism. If you cannot come up with a reason why we should unblock you, we won't, and your talk page access will most likely be revoked. Favonian (talk) 09:46, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock me[edit]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

24.233.99.119 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

24.233.99.119 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Newyork1219". The reason given for Newyork1219's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Toddst1 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Considering the recent edit history of this IP, e.g. this, the auto-block is best left in place. Favonian (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bonar Law Memorial School, you may be blocked from editing. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:08, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Abercrombie & Fitch‎‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CliffC (talk) 14:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.