User talk:24.249.54.254

November 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tallboy (bomb), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Boeing B-29 Superfortress, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 02:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

And you're warned for personal attacks. Acroterion (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.249.54.254 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The changes were not unsourced and I repeatedly pointed to the sources. There are ENTIRE SECTIONS backing up the summary edits.

For instance, in the B-29 article the information is cited in the Korean war section. In the Tallboy section the information is also from the Korean war section. In the MG151 section it is literally posted directly at the end of the post.

The user who made the false claim has a long history of this kind of behavior and was reported to the admin page. 24.249.54.254 (talk) 03:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The way to prove that you're posting sourced content is to link us to the source. See WP:CITE for instructions. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:10, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2020[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sandstein 13:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.249.54.254 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All I did was report that a member with medical problems was behaving increasingly erratic and even quoted his erratic behavior. I have done nothing to harass anyone. The member has been also repeatedly been reported for stalking other members to revert their edits, which multiple people have reported over the last few years. That is harassment. Reporting it is not. 24.249.54.254 (talk) 15:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Appeals containing more personal attacks will not be considered. Acroterion (talk) 04:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop[edit]

Stop repeating your attacks in your unblock requests. You may not agree with your block but you have been told by two admins, I will be number three, that you are violating policy. You will not be unblocked as long as you are violating policy. If you continue to misuse the unblock template you may lose the ability to edit this page. Tiderolls 15:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the user is evading their block, see Special:Contributions/2600:100A:B02F:A63:109C:2408:2277:5678. Sandstein 15:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More of the same from 174.234.0.139. Favonian (talk) 16:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.