User talk:2402:D000:8100:A97A:8913:999C:76C:AEFF

January 2024[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello ^(music) 08:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was also designated a contentious topic, so by reverting twice you are already edit warring. I also ask you, are you in any way related to Josh Cahill? RetroCosmos (talk) 09:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://avgeekery.com/airline-fires-crew-bans-youtuber-over-critical-flight-review/ & https://www.bild.de/reise/fluege/fluege/josh-cahill-will-qatar-airways-einen-airline-kritiker-zum-schweigen-bringen-86462166.bild.html - have been provided as a proper source and no explanation was given at the talk page. "Cahill, a Czech-Australian based in Colombo, Sri Lanka, filmed the video at the center of the controversy in August 2023." vs. an archived and ever since deleted article. How is this considered a wrong edit? Boarding passes clearly show CAHILL JOSH as legal name and not as "Professional name" - do you mind explaining? 2402:D000:8100:A97A:8913:999C:76C:AEFF (talk) 09:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No matter how right you think you are, you are edit warring. Discuss on the talk page without reverting. — Czello ^(music) 09:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of an archive is to preserve an article from being deleted and changed. I see no reason why an archive would hurt the credibility of a source. RetroCosmos (talk) 09:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was probably changed/deleted cuz the information was wrong... or do you have more information on this matter? 112.134.143.52 (talk) 09:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.