User talk:2404:E801:2003:2430:792C:F613:F2EE:9CFE

January 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Charles & Keith, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charles & Keith. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 10:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charles & Keith. John Yunshire (talk) 15:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2404:E801:2003:2430:792C:F613:F2EE:9CFE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have provided several references that Charles_&_Keith is a fast fashion brand not a fashion house at this edit and Justanothersgwikieditor and I have agreed not to put in the Valiram part until it is resolved in the Talk section here and he accepted the fast fashion references which is why I did not edit after. However, 118.219.104.125, and his sockpuppets have been removing the fast fashion part in the edits , which is why there was a need to revert back to include the fast fashion part. I had raised the issue and requested for the page to be protected earlier today because the following users:User 118.219.104.125,User 183.82.204.255 ,User 58.136.247.250, User 58.120.254.76, User:Bayinshall and also User Pirata297 (who speak with the same tone over Valiram as User 58.136.247.250) have been vandalizing with the constant reverts ever since I started updating the outdated page since 11 January. They also have the same habit of adding the same unnecessary fluff to the page like stating all 37 countries the stores are in and tagging them individually (proof, proof). I don't think any reader is on that page to find out the different countries on this planet. They were just here pretending to add new information while deleting all my updates. The same few accounts had been at it ever since I posted the LVMH link and corrected the inaccuracy of it being a fashion house. The bag/shoe brand has been stated to be fast fashion like Zara in numerous articles so why can't it be updated? Please at least investigate properly who's vandalizing and revert to the correct version and ban the correct sockpuppets. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Unblock requests should address your own actions, and not those of others, see WP:NOTTHEM. You may address grievances with other users' behavior once unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.