User talk:2409:4063:4B92:B744:0:0:BB4A:A30F

October 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Tatum O'Neal, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 13:55, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Juno Temple, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Please stop making these revisions: they introduce very pedestrian writing, lacking grammatical variation and overplaying the whole "is known of" trope. Drmies (talk) 15:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tillotama Shome. Please stop. I am not the only editor to take issue with the language you are introducing to the leads of very visible articles. Drmies (talk) 15:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You've been reverted by User:Pizzaplayer219, User:FMSky, and User:Revirvlkodlaku. If the latter two had left warnings here (and they should have), you would have been blocked already. Sorry, but your edits do NOT find approval, and on a collaborative project that means it's time to stop. Drmies (talk) 15:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.