User talk:247publicity

Concern regarding Draft:KingDarius TheGreat[edit]

Hello, 247publicity. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:KingDarius TheGreat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brittney Richardson (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Trivial mentions and interviews are not needed to determine notability. It is established by multiple independent reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brittney Richardson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brittney Richardson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 19:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 247publicity! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 19:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your username[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "247publicity", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:12, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

247publicity (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

miguelcruzedits (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My clients pay me to represent them for publicity that includes a possible placement in Wikipedia if they are credible enough. I understand the reason that I was blocked was for my username and I changed it. I do not and I will not use my account for any advertising and promotion. I will continue to only add credible people to Wikipedia

Decline reason:

No thanks. See WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. We aren't interested in you writing about your clients for publicity. Yamla (talk) 17:13, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

247publicity (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My clients are credible, have coverage and have reliable sources for proof that they belong in Wikipedia. Although my clients pay me for services, this would not fall under paid promotion. Writing about their selves is highly discouraged on Wikipedia. Thus, my clients use me as a vehicle to add their articles to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia is a work that contains information on all branches of knowledge or treats comprehensively a particular branch of knowledge usually in articles arranged alphabetically often by subject. I believe that my clients meet the very definition of having an article in an encyclopedia based on their contributions to society. If for some some reason, my reasons are not good enough, can someone explain as to why and what the next step would be instead of "we aren't interested in you writing about your clients."

Decline reason:

This is the very definition of paid promotion. Wikipedia is not here to publicize your clients. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

247publicity (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been accused of "paid promotion" when I don't offer promotion. I am a publicist. I work for a public-relations firm. I offer publicity. I get paid (which I took all of the correct steps to disclose) by my clients for services including creating and editing their Wikipedia pages. Wikipedia recognizes clients as stated in WP:PAID "Client: the person or organization on whose behalf the edits are made; the client is often the subject of the article." I only create and edit articles for clients who are have the required notability. It states "If you have been hired by a public-relations firm to edit Wikipedia, you must disclose both the firm and the firm's client." I did all of that. Can someone explain to me where to go from here so I that I can continue to create and edit?

Decline reason:

Again, this is the very definition of paid promotion. Wikipedia is not here to promote your clients. You may not use Wikipedia to write about your clients. I suggest you tell them that the service you are selling is actually not allowed on Wikipedia. There are many other websites out there, but this project is a neutrally written encyclopedia and we don't want our articles written by someone who has such a strong conflict of interest. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 06:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Brittney Richardson[edit]

Hello, 247publicity. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brittney Richardson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]