User talk:2506Locks

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 2506Locks, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Rockets-Lakers brawl, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dino245 (talk) 00:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hey there. I am one of the respondents on IRC about your new article draft. I was busy at the moment, and I'm always very skeptical of anyone's first article because most of them are junk which do mandate deletion! After you left IRC, I was able to take a look at yours and I was so moved by the tip-top quality by a new user, that I dug in a bit myself. And I don't even care for sports, so that's saying a lot. I can't believe anyone ever thought that content was gibberish so I have to assume that, plus his deletion of your AfC template, plus his failure to remove this warning here, must have been a triple-blunderous typo somehow. You made a rootin' tootin' spittin' fist-fightin' debut on Wikipedia, to the highest standards. How is that possible for the first draft of your first article? Your first edit included exhaustively complete writing and wikicode formatting. You must have had a lot of wiki experience somewhere.

See my edit comments about tense and "many", except I'd say "many Lakers" is okay, but just verify the edits I did make about it. You have my compliments for the very rare correct grammatical use of the magical possessive ending in an "s" sound with "Phillips's" and "James's". I think most people are ignorant about that, whether casually or belligerently. I've done much battle at Robin Williams, usually rewriting the sentence to eliminate 20 occurrences down to 2 or 3 total occurrences. Similarly, you use real words to describe observations such as "criticized" or "believed" instead of junk like "felt", which I especially notice in a very emotionally charged and opinionated subject. — Smuckola (talk) 02:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Smuckola: Hey! Thanks for your kind words. Yes, the draft did take a while to make, but it was worth it. I did try to emulate it off other articles related to my subject here on Wikipedia. The more time I spend writing something towards perfection (or close to it), the less someone else has to work on it. It's beneficial for all rather then just dumping a stub out there and never coming back to it. I'll try to take it to a good article or close to it soon with some more editing (don't really know how feasible that is, hehe). I have no issue with any of your edits, although I might make a small tweak here or there. Really, thank you for your copyediting. Prose and grammar are things which I'm not too good on and it's nice to have a experienced editor look at them. If you need anything else from me, please let me know. 2506Locks (talk) 13:35, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. It sucks about the AfD nomination. You've got the number of citations but they're mostly concerned about lasting coverage, longer than just a few weeks. WP:LASTING and others. Does that exist? I don't see a response to that. Also it got that "orphaned" tag so you could go to the articles listed in See also, and link back such as National Basketball Association criticisms and controversies, Violence in sports, and List of violent spectator incidents in sports. I see those simply from trolling the other articles' See also sections. Do you have any further response? If not, your debut was a killer effort and lobbed a three-point shot from across the AfC court. If you could do this, you could do another one! Bust out that sandbox. — Smuckola (talk) 20:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lakers–Rockets brawl for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lakers–Rockets brawl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakers–Rockets brawl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Bagumba (talk) 10:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Lakers-Rockets brawl[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Lakers-Rockets brawl at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ə XPLICIT 02:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Lakers-Rockets brawl at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]