User talk:2600:1700:1250:6D80:9C24:DCBC:8EE4:8A20

user:Generalrelative so that's how you are going to play this? By deleting my good faith comment from your talk page? I've never said a bad word about you, in fact I tried to assist you in searching for contributions. I understand we are political opponents, but as I've said before, that shouldn't mean that we spend our time trying to get each other kicked off the project. I certainly have no interest in doing so. It's a shame because I honestly had a great deal of respect for you. It's obvious you are a professor or scholar of some sort, and I have learned from your contributions. But you've made it clear that you don't believe there is room for me on this project. Very disappointing. 2600:1700:1250:6D80:9C24:DCBC:8EE4:8A20 (talk) 00:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal Key[edit]

(Redacted) 2600:1700:1250:6D80:9C24:DCBC:8EE4:8A20 (talk) 16:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post your appeal key publicly. Thanks. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:09, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1700:1250:6D80:9C24:DCBC:8EE4:8A20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't completely understand why I was blocked. I have not caused any disruption. I realize there were problems in the past, but I havent done anything since Ive returned. My biggest crime is complimenting another user talk:Rayner111 on a fine article that they wrote. I complimented them on a fine job, and immediately was thrown into the furnace. If a condition of my unblocking is for me to not make any contributions EXCEPT to article mainspace, I am happy to do so. Even user:Generalrelative, the editor who I have sparred with in the past, doesn't think I should be blocked. Even though we are political opponents, we still respect each other and consider each other on wiki friends (or at least we did). Please tell me what I need to do in order to have a peaceful existence here and I promise to abide 2600:1700:1250:6D80:9C24:DCBC:8EE4:8A20 (talk) 16:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The record here makes clear that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Please find another hobby. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:15, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The level of gaslighting here is off the rails. I explicitly requested this block at AE: [1]. And I've made it abundantly clear that my disagreement with this user has nothing to do with politics: [2] (same user in that exchange, different IP range; please take note, paper trail upon request). Generalrelative (talk) 17:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.