Jump to content

User talk:2600:387:6:80F:0:0:0:72

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2018[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Olympe de Gouges, you may be blocked from editing. KNHaw (talk) 20:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to West Germanic languages has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Western United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unban[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:387:6:80F:0:0:0:72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

disruptive editing 2600:387:6:80F:0:0:0:72 (talk) 17:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:387:6:80F:0:0:0:72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Disruptive Editing 2600:387:6:80F:0:0:0:72 (talk) 17:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is very likely you have not been personally blocked. Unfortunately, we are unable to unblock you because you have been caught in a rangeblock. These are applied to stop persistent vandals from using multiple IP addresses to evade their block. For our security, we cannot release this block early unless there is clear evidence of severe collateral damage. You can, however, log in to edit. If you don't have an account, you can request an account, making sure to add a link to this page for our reference in the comments section. Sorry for the inconvenience, but please let us know if you have any questions.

A minority of rangeblocks are "hard blocked" and prohibit editing even if logged in, due to exceptional vandalism or other similar issues. If despite creating an account, you still find that you cannot edit even when logged in, then please contact us again with the relevant error message. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I haven't done anything disruptive in I believe over 5 years and I was still young back then. I have grown since then and I won't do anything bad again. 2600:387:6:80F:0:0:0:72 (talk) 17:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2600:387:6:80F:0:0:0:72&oldid=1182115904"