User talk:2601:199:4181:E00:49B4:9716:A7D1:F663
Unblock request
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
2601:199:4181:E00:49B4:9716:A7D1:F663 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for starting an edit war over a Blender list that showed obvious bias, yet everybody reinstated the mentions under the poor excuses of "it's factual" and "it's opinions" because of the neutral point of view. That was a foolish decision to make and I regret disrespecting somebody's opinion, no matter how stupid it was. The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. 2601:199:4181:E00:49B4:9716:A7D1:F663 (talk) 15:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
When you say "I regret disrespecting somebody's opinion, no matter how stupid it was" I don't really think that you regret anything. This does not convince me that you know how to properly handle an editing dispute without edit warring. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock request 2
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
2601:199:4181:E00:49B4:9716:A7D1:F663 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for starting an edit war over a Blender list that showed obvious bias, yet everybody reinstated the mentions under the poor excuses of "it's factual" and "it's opinions" because of the neutral point of view. That was a foolish decision to make and I regret disrespecting somebody's opinion. The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. 2601:199:4181:E00:49B4:9716:A7D1:F663 (talk) 16:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Really quite abusive to try the same unblock request that has already been declined. Yamla (talk) 19:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |