User talk:2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC

June 2018

Your recent editing history at Assassination of Abraham Lincoln shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I suggest before you revert again now, that you take it too the talk page to discuss. Also see WP:BRD NZFC^(talk) 03:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

That's fine donner, I literally used the same sourced I cited. it's reference 27, just read. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:29, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC reported by User:NZ Footballs Conscience (Result: ). Thank you. NZFC^(talk) 03:31, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

That's fine, spread whatever disinformation you'd like. If you want to edit history try not citing an article that literally fails to establish the claim your referencing it to. For a layman to come by and notice the inaccuracy of this statement just based on a cursory investigation into the "evidence" supporting the claim shows how "well" this article is being curated. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

---