User talk:2603:7000:2143:8500:20A5:9F62:A893:774A

March 2021

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --ThanosYourGod (talk) 23:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Did I fail to? 2603:7000:2143:8500:20A5:9F62:A893:774A (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

You wrote “ no cite, no article”, which sounds quite offensive I believe. Sorry. --ThanosYourGod (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

• I fail to understand. The entries in question lacked any cite. And they lacked any wp article. What sounds offensive? 2603:7000:2143:8500:20A5:9F62:A893:774A (talk) 23:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Paisarepa. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Oxford University Ice Hockey Club have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Paisarepa 23:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please explain what you view as nonconstructive. 2603:7000:2143:8500:20A5:9F62:A893:774A (talk) 23:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

My mistake entirely. Sorry! Paisarepa 23:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Stay safe. 2603:7000:2143:8500:20A5:9F62:A893:774A (talk) 23:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Oxford University Women's Boat Club. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

Please see WP:BRD. When reverted, especially by an experienced user, you should make use of the talk page to introduce your view point such that you either resolve it or let another contributor do. Assem Khidhr (talk) 13:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---