User talk:2603:8081:160A:BE2A:6460:EB74:4175:FD5C

December 2020

Your recent editing history at Chiropractic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 20:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello,

I did not make the other edits about chiropractic. I had only added that even though it is considered psuedoscientific, many schools grant a D.C. to them and that many governments recognize them to be physicians. As I've said, I believe that this needs to be discussed.2603:8081:160A:BE2A:6460:EB74:4175:FD5C (talk) 20:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Yes, you did make the previous edit; both are from IPs near Plano, TX. And that is edit warring. Don't restore without consensus. Sundayclose (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

To clarify, I made that other edit but not the others that were involved (i.e. the ones that tried to remove the information). Sorry for the misconception.2603:8081:160A:BE2A:6460:EB74:4175:FD5C (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

What you wrote makes little sense. In any event, however, you were edit warring. Sundayclose (talk) 21:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

I apologize for that. I do want to get consensus on this issue as it is a very heated topic. 2603:8081:160A:BE2A:6460:EB74:4175:FD5C (talk) 21:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

There's nothing "heated" about their education except your edit warring. The consensus isn't whether it should be included in the article because it is in the article; the issue is whether it should be in the lead. Sundayclose (talk) 21:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

---