User talk:2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD
July 2023[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bandi Sanjay Kumar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Portwoman (talk) 17:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Portwoman: you're on the fast train to an administrative block, if you don't quit tagging user talk pages with templates about "edit warring", "disruptive", etc when editors make corrections from references which don't suit your point of view. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD (talk) 18:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in Afd[edit]
Hi anon! I saw your contribution on NetReputation's Afd recently. Might you vote? There's here. Many thanks, gretuful to be part of community! Paranoya23 (talk) 11:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, OK I will thanks. Been digging around for more reliable sources, but have so far come up empty handed. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD (talk) 12:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Btw, do you have mind that even stub-class page doesn't have right to exist? Yeah, poor number of sources, but we have deal with a censorship company who cleanup negative from search engines, including Leo Molloy's case. But they will never cleanup the Wikipedia. I just participate in WikiProjects around censorship and freedom of speech, so it's my just 2nd page after "Murder of Kateryna Handziuk", so it frustrating me a little bit. Pls don't be critical too much, let's sorting out on this case, and I will move forward to others. Paranoya23 (talk) 12:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Well I was thinking that the Lee Molloy incident is worth merging to online reputation management, and that that section of a larger article is itself worth splitting out to a separate article. NetReputation isn't the only RM company with a controversial history, and a larger article could make that clear. You've already done some fine legwork about the wider issues of ORM, which I've merged over to the ORM section. Happy to help with that, if you're interested. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD (talk) 12:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I think that merging to online reputation management is not looking good solution because ORM will be overloaded with content size. If we put every censorship case in ORM, then it will be really overload. On my opinion, every "Streisand effect" case should has their separate placement on the Wikipedia. If u wanna connect this case to ORM - add a category. And I might be frustrated to lost the page on which I spent a lot of time. Boring company, but may on florida size they have some fame. Btw, lets keep that and leave the chance to extend content in further cases such as Molloy's. Thx Paranoya23 (talk) 13:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- If content about any one company in there gets too big, it can be split off. And we don't need a comprehensive catalog in an ORM article of all the companies, just a good representative sample. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD (talk) 13:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- As I specified on my User page, my main aim is to create 50 articles undergo WikiProjects on censorship/freedom of speech topic. I thought I able make 1 articler per 1 week, but on NetRep I spent already too much time. It will frustrate me lol, maybe should I abandon it if haven't any progress in number of pages on myself...May be let's leave the page for a while, then get back in a while and will see if some additional WP:ORGCRIT sources will be finded. Paranoya23 (talk) 13:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- If content about any one company in there gets too big, it can be split off. And we don't need a comprehensive catalog in an ORM article of all the companies, just a good representative sample. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD (talk) 13:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I think that merging to online reputation management is not looking good solution because ORM will be overloaded with content size. If we put every censorship case in ORM, then it will be really overload. On my opinion, every "Streisand effect" case should has their separate placement on the Wikipedia. If u wanna connect this case to ORM - add a category. And I might be frustrated to lost the page on which I spent a lot of time. Boring company, but may on florida size they have some fame. Btw, lets keep that and leave the chance to extend content in further cases such as Molloy's. Thx Paranoya23 (talk) 13:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Well I was thinking that the Lee Molloy incident is worth merging to online reputation management, and that that section of a larger article is itself worth splitting out to a separate article. NetReputation isn't the only RM company with a controversial history, and a larger article could make that clear. You've already done some fine legwork about the wider issues of ORM, which I've merged over to the ORM section. Happy to help with that, if you're interested. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD (talk) 12:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Btw, do you have mind that even stub-class page doesn't have right to exist? Yeah, poor number of sources, but we have deal with a censorship company who cleanup negative from search engines, including Leo Molloy's case. But they will never cleanup the Wikipedia. I just participate in WikiProjects around censorship and freedom of speech, so it's my just 2nd page after "Murder of Kateryna Handziuk", so it frustrating me a little bit. Pls don't be critical too much, let's sorting out on this case, and I will move forward to others. Paranoya23 (talk) 12:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |