User talk:2A02:2F09:3603:DB00:C24:599D:5967:8DA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2023[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits, as done at Bucharest.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Hadal (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2A02:2F09:3603:DB00:C24:599D:5967:8DA1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

2 weeks is not a little too harsh? I mean I did not even engage in a real war of reverts. Others received 48-72 hours or even 24 for a first mistake. If you think it's a mistake because I stil discussed it on a different page with same users. I was not even warned, I didn't know you are an admin and I must comply. I APOLOGIZE, I am a good faith user and contributor

Decline reason:

Your edits were ludicrous. See WP:CRYSTALBALL. Nothing here convinces me you would not attempt to repeat the edits if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 22:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2A02:2F09:3603:DB00:C24:599D:5967:8DA1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi guys! It's been almost 1 week, can the ban be reduced to 1 week instead of 2? I did not engage in a war of reverts and I was not really warned that I could be blocked. It's been a long time, I wanted to come back to Wikipedia. If it's possible, thanks!

Decline reason:

No. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.