User talk:2D/HideRFAResults

Consensus

Support

• Creator support. _David^WS _(contribs) 20:50, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

• Oppose impractical. I like seeing the supports and opposes; both can influence my decision. RfA is about openness, and while I agree that some bits need changing, this is not the way to do so. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 20:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

• Would support, but I believe it to be a technical impossibility. — neuro^(talk) 20:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Heh. I would personally write the code to do this. It is possible I believe. _David^WS _(contribs) 20:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Any client side code would obviously be circumventable, are you planning to get it implemented into MW itself? — neuro^(talk) 08:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes. Someone suggested that the quiz feature at Wikiversity already does something similar. _David^WS _(contribs) 13:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Actually, considering moving to oppose based on the fact that one user cannot check every contribution that a user has made - the number of users viewing a user and scrutinising their contributions means that more contributions are checked. — neuro^(talk) 09:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)