User talk:31.142.58.97

June 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sheikh Said, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 23:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sheikh Said rebellion, you may be blocked from editing. Semsûrî (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sheikh Said]. Chip3004 (talk) 01:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

deception is against wikipedia rules. You have no argument but change historical facts in direction of your ideology. Tell if you know a kuridsh citizenship law of the day or any argument. Otherwise do not disrupt. 31.142.58.97 (talk) 01:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter as your edits are still distruptive Chip3004 (talk) 01:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sheikh Said shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chip3004 (talk) 02:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

deception alert[edit]

As I understand a kurdish racist deceives wikipedia policies. For example, Sheikh Said was a Turkish citizen but someone argues that he was Kurdish by nationality. There was no Kurdish country in those years so this is not possible. However, his ethnicity was Kurdic for sure. For this reason, I call wikipedia to focus on this accounts which publishes ideological ideas instead of historical facts. 31.142.58.97 (talk) 23:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.