User talk:32.218.108.106

Hello, 32.218.108.106, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

32.218.108.106, good luck, and have fun. scope_creep^Talk 19:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mildred Harnack

Hi @32.218.108.106: I see that you removed that content around Harnack being a co-editor on the lit magazine. Can you not remove content until the conversation is finished, at least. I know there is WP:BOLD, but the general rule is not to remove content during a copyedit, when the work is still being worked on, unless it is really dodgy. I would advise not to remove it as it seen as disruptive and could get you blocked. It might have been something really important, that could have opened a whole new section, as I have seen multiple times and I was still looking for a ref last night, so why remove it, when I've not even come back with an answer yet? Look for consensus. scope_creep^Talk 13:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a newbie editor. I was just finishing up for the day with a number of little edits and this one seemed OK; it seemed like a minor point that wasn't integral to the article. I know the general practice is that it doesn't require consensus to remove material that is unsupported by sources, as this one wasn't. Sorry if I offended you. 32.218.108.106 (talk) 13:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.