User talk:35.133.211.113

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bismuth(III) oxide, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bismuth(III) oxide, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 16:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KanysLupys, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~ Chip🐺 17:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently (and now pretty disruptively) editing while logged out.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Response[edit]

Why don't you try applying your rules evenly next time instead of singling out people who are just trying to contribute to the platform? If you're going to not allow someone to add something in without a reference then you should also remove everything else that doesn't have a reference there too!!! Where is the logic in removing what I added on but letting the two previous synthetic methods that had NO REFERENCES stay up? Why would you single ME out when you had no reason whatsoever to believe that what I had added to the page was in any way incorrect or the others correct?! So yeah if you aren't going to enforce your rules fairly then I will enforce them for you and hold everyone else on that page to the same standard you held me!!!