User talk:3XYEMaj

November 2023[edit]

Hi 3XYEMaj! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 05:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. Thank you, Alexeyevitch. 3XYEMaj (talk) 06:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing[edit]

Hello, 3XYEMaj. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 04:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind offering some guidance or specifics? I tried using other published articles as templates for guidance in creating the first article. Should I note the original Wikipages I referenced in Talk page? Subjects being unrelated, the aviator I'd heard about years ago, and the doctor not seeing articles to link to, I researched and created article on their foundation which seemed to be equally newsworthy. The main references I used were newspaper articles I could find. Perhaps the publications on the doctor article are eliciting the advertising? I discovered half publications and half presentations or course materials, but listed as Selected Works as that's how others seemed to have other media works listed. Do these need to be bifurcated? Or is it the presentations that's the flag as I'd only seen that listed on a couple pages and those were Tedx? Seeing after the fact where Wayback archives are cited differently, so the citations likely need to be cleaned up as these were archives, but from Newspaper.com. I'm not seeing a clear example on the Template:Cite news page with regards to if the archive has to be attainable via a hyperlink online and if not how to address. Guidance is very welcome. 3XYEMaj (talk) 13:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Robeson has been accepted[edit]

Susan Robeson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Merry Christmas, and a happy new year)} 21:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin John McAleese Memorial Foundation (February 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kevin John McAleese Memorial Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 3XYEMaj! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, 3XYEMaj. Thank you for your work on Kent H. Dixon. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Could use 1-2 sources that cover him in depth.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]